Nikolay Mihaylov
Николай Михайлов
Ianko
Iankov. BioBibliography
Yanko
Yankov. BioBibliographie
Янко Янков. БиоБиблиография
2006 г.
Nikolay Mihaylov, Ianko
Iankov. BioBibliography, Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2006
Николай
Михайлов, Янко Янков.
БиоБиблиография, София,
Издателство “Янус”, 2006
ISBN-10: 954-8550-55-5
ISBN-13: 978-954-8550-55-0
Biography
Ianko Nikolov Iankov-Velyovski was born on August
13, 1944 in Bulgaria,
Montana District (at the time – Ferdinand, afterwards - Mihaylovgrad), in
the village of Klisuritsa. His parents were ordinary villagers, who earned their
living with agricultural labor; currently deceased.
According to the local
historical data and folk legends, the
village was found in 1688, when, after the Chiprovtsi National Freedom Movement
Revolt was brought under the control of the Turkish authorities, one of its
military leaders, Velyo Stoyov, together
with his family left the burned village
of Klisura (close to Chiprovtsi) and moved about 30
kilometers to the north, where in close proximity to another small mountain
passage (in Bulgarian “klisura”) became the founder of the Velyovski (Velyovtsi) family, which
continued his intensive revolutionary activities and the founder of the
village of Klisuritsa (i.e. the Small
Klisura)[1]. Ianko Iankov is an heir of this Velyovski family.2
He graduated his primary
education in 1958 in his home
village, and high school – in 1962 in the town of Montana (at the time – Mihaylovgrad). From
the autumn of 1962 until the autumn of 1964, he served in the army as a radio
operator with the rank „private”; afterwards his rank never changed.
In 1967, Ianko
Iankov was accepted as a student in the University of Sofia, first in the Faculty of Slavic Studies, major Bulgarian Philology, and later, in December 1973 he
graduated higher education in the Faculty
of Law and was awarded a diploma in major Law (Lawyer, Master’s Degree in Law – LL.M.).
Since his student years, under
the influence of the western democracy, of the anti-communist events in Czechoslovakia
in 1968, and his general mental mood, he has formulated and undertaken partial
practical testing of the thesis for
eventual possibility of legal opposition to the totalitarian communist system
by using supreme legal and ideological knowledge.
The first scientific works and
publications of Ianko Iankov were
made when he was a student in the third year, and in April 1974, he won a
competition and began his scientific career as a researcher (Research
Fellow) in the Institute of State and Legal Sciences with the Bulgarian Academy of
Sciences and as a lecturer (Assistant Professor) in the Faculty of Law of the University of Sofia.
Although pretty cautiously, since the very 1975
he has
started intensive practical implementation of his thesis for use of his supreme
legal qualification for performing activity for protection of the violated
individual rights of relatives and trusted friends (as a form of legal and political opposition to the
communist system). The disclosed records of State Security show that at that time Ianko Iankov has already become a routine supervision subject for
the secret services. In 1978, he broadened his scope of activities by including
also protection of the violated rights of many other people, as a result of
which the secret services’ supervision grew to special supervision.
In 1979-1980, Ianko
Iankov started the formation of an unofficial and in its essence illegal
organization (with no written
statues and program but with orally agreed statutory and program principles), that aims at
collecting and precisely analyzing different practical legal cases related to
violation of human rights, which could later on be used as a form of active and
mass official faultlessly legitimate and right-defending but political in its essence
opposition to the communist system in socialist Bulgaria.
As a repressive answer of his
completely legally irreproachable legal defense activity and under cruel
violation of the Labor Code and the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences Statutes, on March 18, 1982
he was illegally fired from his prestigious scientific and teaching work in
the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences and
in the University of Sofia. The disclosed records of State Security now show
that his dismissal from work was assured by prior planned special operative
action, undertaken by the Bulgarian
branch of the KGB.
***
During the same year, Ianko Iankov started active contacts with representatives of a number of western
embassies in Sofia (most of all the
embassy of Great Britain, USA, France and Germany), to which he submitted a great number of official documents evidencing
violation of the human rights in Bulgaria;
consequently
these submitted documents became subject of investigation of the Conference of Madrid and Stockholm regarding
the human rights issues.
In May 1983, leaving the embassy
of France, where he submitted more than 1500
pages
of documentation, Ianko Iankov was arrested, by in two months he was released – both due to legal impossibility of proving any of the
accusations against him (for terrorism against the embassy and for propaganda
in the embassy against the state and political regime in Bulgaria) and due to (or more
appropriately most of all) the effective
diplomatic and propaganda intersession of several western countries rendered
against the Bulgarian authorities.
During
the
summer of 1983, Ianko Iankov created in the town of Montana a
special illegal group, which distributed a great amount of political leaflets
against the authority from the autumn of 1983 until the autumn of 1984 under
the immediate leadership of his brother Kamen Iankov. The disclosed
records of State Security now show
that the secret services have made over 150 (one hundred and fifty) prevention arrests and
they have been engaged very intensively in tracing down the doers for a period
of whole six years, without any
result whatsoever.
It was not until the beginning of 1990, when as a
member of the National Political
Round Table and as a Congressman in
the Great National Assembly Ianko Iankov gave publicity to the truth about
the leaflets and soon afterwards by chemical-medical means his brother
was killed by State Security, and since then the
already democratic Bulgarian prosecution (headed by magistrates loyal to the
communist “idea”) has been neglecting in total silence each of his many
requests for investigation of the cause of his brother’s death.
In the beginning of March 1984, the home of Yanko Yankov in the village of Klisuritsa
was visited by the political
secretary of the US
embassy Josef Keel (which, as far as I
know, is the only visit of a western diplomat in to private Bulgarian home for
the 50 years of communist regime). Only a week later, with resolution
dated March 15, 1984 of the Regional Court in the town of Mihaylovgrad (under APDH No. 5 dated March 13, 1984), under serious violation of the official legal regulations, Ianko Iankov was arrested, deported and exiled
to heavy forced physical labor in semi-secured concentration camp (called „Himik workers’
hostel”) in the region of the chemical plants in the town of Devnya, Varna District.
He was
taken there by an armed police escort and he not only did categorically refuse
to work even for one minute but also, taking advantage of the comparatively
free movement regime on the huge territory of the several plant, the available
comparatively easy to access telephones and the argument that he will talk to
his family in Sofia, he made a series of phone conversation with diplomats from
the embassies of USA, France, and Germany.
On May 22, 1984, Ianko Iankov was arrested and the following
three charges were brought against him: ►creation and leading of a
subversive organization; ►conducting subversive
propaganda against Bulgaria, the Soviet Union, and the socialist member states of
the military bloc the “Warsaw Pact”; and ►instigating foreign countries to hostile actions
against Bulgaria. Since his arrest,
he raised the well-grounded thesis that he was innocent, whereas he even
demonstratively stressed on the fact that he was „innocent due to lack of evidence” (not lack of deed).
***
On December 24, 1984, Ianko Iankov was sentenced to 12 years
of prison under extremely strict regime,
and in
1985, his sentence was “corrected” to 6 years and 6 months
under the same regime. The disclosed
records of the Bulgarian branch of KGB now
show that the arrest, trial, and his special treatment in the prison were
secured by conducting several strictly confidential operative actions, which code names were „The lousy guy”, „The wild guy”, „The vicious guy”, „The bullhead guy”, „Terrorist”, „Disobedient” and „Dragon”.
Only
two weeks after the arrest of Ianko Iankov the US Department of State published a special
report (read on June 06, 1984 on Free Europe Radio), wherein his name was mentioned as an example of a Bulgarian
citizen, deprived of his human rights, and soon later the rights-defending
organization Amnesty International announced him for a person under its protection.
During the stay of Ianko Iankov in prison, the
international rights-defending organizations Amnesty
International and Helsinky Watch announced his for a political
prisoner No. 1 of Bulgaria. The American Bar
Association, Lawyers Committee for Human
Rights and a number of other national and international rights-defending
organizations undertook protests against the Bulgarian government regarding the
illegal trial of Ianko Iankov. The Free Europe, the Voice of America and the
BBC
radios broadcasted many programs, dedicated to his activity and his
inhuman treatment in prison. In March 1989, during the
official work of the Congress, the President of the Socialist International
Willi Brandt himself officially announced a number of facts both for
his political and rights-defending activity and for the specific repression
system that he was subject to in the Bulgarian prisons.
Moreover, a number of
documents show that during implementation of a strictly confidential action of State
Security Ianko Iankov was subjected to a
special physical treatment system and chemical-pharmaceutical influence, for harming his
extremely healthy organism and most of all breaking his will. This action,
however, despite the partial success in the first purpose (multiple bone breaking and a tumor formation in his
adrenal gland), concluded with absolutely full
failure of the authorities regarding the second purpose: ►on the second and third year of his stay in the
prison, it is properly stated in official documents that he is systematically
violating the internal rules, systematically provoking the supervising security
members and constitutes danger both for the prisoners and the warders; ►in the letter of characteristics, officially issued
upon leaving of the prison, it is recorded that he is strong-willed, persistent in
chasing his goals and all his actions are always purposeful.
Ianko
Iankov
stays in prison until his full serving of his term of
imprisonment; due to the fact
that under the adopted rules and practices two working days (as an shoemaker)
equal three days, de facto he stays
in prison 5 years, 7 months and 3 days
of calendar time, and is released on October 31, 1989 (exactly ten days
before the official date of the change of the political regime); along with the two months from his previous arrest
and the two months and ten days of stay in the concentration camp his actual time of imprisonment was 5 (five) years, 11 (eleven) months
and 13 (thirteen) days.
***
In December 1989, Ianko Iankov was pardoned with a law but he refused to
accept the amnesty based on the thesis that „the legally sentenced
may be pardoned but the illegally
sentenced may not”, and submitted an
official petition for a new court trial.
On
March 30, 1990, the General Assembly of the Penal Bars of the
Supreme Court issued a resolution, under
which Ianko Iankov was declared fully
innocently sentenced under full lack of the
evidence required by the law,
and
his sentence was revoked. One of the very emblematic facts regarding his
illegal sentencing was that fact that in the last and highest court bar, which
declared his innocently sentenced, most of the judges who earlier, during the
discussion of his case in the different previous instances, participated both
in his declaring innocent and in his sentencing; these judges were never asked
“In which case did they act according to their supreme conscience and in which
they acted as cringing for a bowl of lentils mean and unscrupulous agents of
the secret services?”.
Despite his many
official written requests, up to now there is no one of the culprits
punished for his illegal arrest, sentencing and imprisonment; the only military prosecutor (colonel Nikolay Kolev), who dared undertake an investigation case against only
a small part of the culprits, was soon after killed and the investigation case
was suspended; the prosecutor, who
suspended the case (colonel Nikolay
Ganchev), was almost immediately
to “general” and a little later he became owner of a luxurious hotel in a
prestigious mountain resort..
Moreover, until now Ianko Iankov has not received even a cent
as a compensation for the suffered material and moral damages and
benefits missed. Furthermore:
а)
on one hand all, who during
the time of the classical communist regime participated in some way in the
illegal repression of Ianko Iankov, almost right after were generously rewarded; their
most generous reward however was exactly after the so-called „political changes”, when they reached not only the highest points in their
professional hierarchy, but also stunning profiteering; according to his yet preliminary and not full
calculations only regarding his illegal arrest, sentence, and imprisonment,
more than 200 (two hundred) agents, trusted people and offices of State
Security were engaged; some of the “most eminent” of them are now:
eminent
businessmen, democratic generals, members of the Supreme Court Council, supreme judges, constitution judges, judges in the international courts in Strasbourg and
Hague, ministers and deputy ministers (including of justice and interior), chief prosecutor,
eminent
members of parliament, chairman of
Parliament, famous diplomats.
b) on the other hand: exactly after the political changes Ianko Iankov: ►although already
officially free, he acquired such actual status that gave him reasons to
frequently declare that his pursuit today was much more sinister and perverted
than before; and that his
current status was much more ominous that the prison one: ► in particular, he
stressed on the fact that during the communist regime, his grandmother dies
only three days after arrest, and his grandfather was buried five days after
his first visit to his grandson in prison, and the death of both his
grandparents was directly related to the repressions against him; in the context of a seemingly natural but in fact
well planned by the criminal circles calendar regime, only for a few year, his brother, his father,
and his mother died, whose death he well-groundedly defined as murder, committed by personally and institutionally the
same forces, which earlier subject to repression mainly him and to a lesser
degree – his relatives; exactly after the political “changes” ►although he has two
prestigious higher education degrees (master in
stomatology and master in pedagogy with specialty “Social work with children”), his wife Elka P. Iankova became unemployed almost
immediately after in 1993 she married him, and all employers she addressed for work unambiguously
showed her that the prestigious diplomas do not count due to her spouse choice; ► the professional
realization of Ianko Iankov was firmly limited to an insignificant
researcher in an academic institute and a host-lecturer in an university in the
country, and he was demonstratively superseded in the scientific hierarchy by
people, who have nothing in common with science; ► each his attempt to
achieve any economic stability of his family was always followed by precise
subjection to even more intensive mafia oppression and actual theft.
***
At the end of 1989 and the beginning of 1990, Ianko Iankov participated in the creation of the opposition
in Bulgaria
and in the activity of the so-called at the time National Political “Round Table”. His intensive try to create a right-radical
opposition fraction and to oppose the agreement between the
communist party and the false opposition created from its secret services
leads to his exclusion in March 1990 from participation in the totally collaborationist “Round Table”;
this Ianko Iankov became the
only, both in Bulgaria and in Eastern Europe, participant in the phenomenon
“political round table”, who was excluded
due to the radicalism of his claims for decommunization of society and the
state apparatus.
Under Resolution dated May 15, 1991, of the Presidium
of the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, the dismissal of Ianko Iankov from his scientific
work in the Institute
of Law Sciences was announced illegal and politically
repressive and his rights were recovered.
Nevertheless, for more than
one year, the management of the Institute
of State and Law Sciences with the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, which
consisted from secret agents and evident officers of State Security refused to give effect to this Resolution; as a
result, after the political scandal and most of all after the diplomatic
intervention, the Resolution was effectuated. Up until now, however, not only that none of the
culprits for the illegal dismissal of Ianko Iankov was punished but also he has
not received even a cent of compensation.
***
In 1990 and 1991, Ianko Iankov was a
member of parliament in the Seventh Great National Assembly; from a constitutional point of view, this extremely
rarely convoked Parliament had legal status of a Senate (Upper Parliament
Chamber). There Ianko Iankov gave proof to and
sustained the thesis for legal illegitimacy
(due to the brutal violation of
many constitutionally important legal regulations) of the Seventh Membership of
Parliament, whereas he orally qualified
this parliament membership as “Red mess” and defined as illegitimate all adopted acts, including
the so-called “Constitution of June 12, 1991”, which he refused signing. The circumstance that although at that time the so-called “Constitution” was not signed by another
38 members of parliament also deserves special attention deserves, today Ianko Iankov is the only member
of this parliament that did not engage
in any way whatsoever with the “constitution” deed in question; all other
members consequently as members of parliament in the following common
Parliaments attested the sacred nature of this actually not signed by them
“deed”; as a matter of fact, the
political and judicial foresight of Ianko Iankov is unambiguously shown in the fact that exactly
this „constitution deed” today is not only used as a flag and vindication of
the cruel mafia plunder but it also represents an extremely serious “legal”
hindrance for the European integration of Bulgaria.
On
April 13, 1991, The Bulgarian National Television (29 San Stefano
Str., Sofia 1504) broadcasted a
special one-hour documentary (“This Is the Man”; director Rosen
Elezov), dedicated to the activity of Ianko Iankov as a man and a
politician.
On
March 01, 1995, the Specialized Scientific Law Sciences Council with the Higher Attestation Commission (HAC)
with the Council of Ministers elected Ianko Iankov for a Senior
Research Associate Second Degree (Reader,
Associate professor) in “Theory of the state
and legislation. Political and legal
sciences”.
Ianko Iankov is the founder
and Chairman of: Þthe Liberal
Congress Party; Þthe Union of
Jurists Democrats in Bulgaria; ÞThe Base Institute
for Research and Protection of the Human Rights; Þas well as several
more other public organization.
From 1991 until 1995, Ianko Iankov issued the free newspaper
“Liberal Congress” – printed body of the
political party that he chaired.
Apart from his
scientific research work in the Institute
of Legal Sciences with the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Ianko Iankov was also engaged in university lecturing in
the Faculty of Law of the University of Plovdiv, where he gave lectures on a
number of scientific disciplines: ÞPhilosophy of Law; ÞPsychology of Law; ÞPsychology of
Politics; ÞPolitical and Legal
Doctrines; ÞTheory of Social
Government (Political
Management); ÞForecasting and
Political Forecasting; ÞTheory and Practice
of Terrorism; ÞTanatology (philosophical, psychological and
legal aspects of death).
On
December 15, 1999, the French satellite television ARTE (2a rue de la Fonderie, F-67080 Strasbourg Cedex, journalist Lawent Cibien, 29 av. T. Gauche, 78016
Paris) broadcasted a special
documentary, dedicated to the political and
legal-defensive activity of Ianko Iankov.
For five days, at each round
hour from November 26 to November 30, 2005, the Turkish News Satellite Television TGRT Haber (29 Ekim Cad. N 23, Yenibosna 34530 Istanbul, News Manager Dogan Senturk) broadcasted an exclusive interview with Ianko Iankov, dedicated on the
topic about the role of the former soviet secret services (KGB) and their nowadays
mafia transformation (the Red Mafia) in the current internal political and economical
processes in Bulgaria.
Only several days later,
performing a secret order, assigned by the management of the Bulgarian branch of the Red Mafia and the special services of the
Ministry of Interior, on December 05, 2005 the Director of
the Institute for legal sciences with BAS issued an order for the dismissal of Ianko Iankov, to be effected on the same day, about which he was notified only three days later, on December 08,
2005
(moreover with a slow mail
latter).
It is curious that
while the classical communist repressive services took care to make his first
dismissal in 1982 look at least
formally legitimate, the next dismissal
was performed as a well thought and institutionally and personally secured
brutal demonstration of anti-right force: ►the order was issued
unilaterally by the Director and in
full violation of the obligatory procedure legal rules, which categorically set
forth that such resolutions may be passed only by the Scientific Council; ►furthermore the order was
issued without any motives whatsoever, which is in full contradiction to the
express requirement of the law for motivation of such acts.
With reference to this
dismissal, I want to pay special attention to the following facts from the scenario of the modern theater of the
absurd: а) The Director of the Institute for Legal Sciences with
BAS, Tsvetana Kamenova is not only a daughter of a high-ranking officer and
investigator in one of the most sinister departments of the communist State Security but also she
herself is a high-ranking secret agent of the same special and politically repressive service (this service, by the way, is officially announced from
the Bulgarian Parliament for criminal); b) Ts. Kamenova herself expressly, publicly, ostentatiously,
and many times have stated that this dismissal was preliminary agreed with
the diplomatic representatives of several western country residing in Bulgaria, whereas it will be
acknowledged legitimate by all European political and court institutions; c) only several months before issuance of the order for
this undoubtedly political and repressive dismissal, under proposal of the Bulgarian government Ts. Kamenova was
elected by the General Meeting of the
United Nations for a Judge in the
International Court in Hague and was included in a court membership, which
will discuss the cases for the crimes of the communist regime in Yugoslavia; d) nevertheless, let me once again specifically formulate
probably the very naïve questions: „-Why is Ianko Iankov still subject of repression
today?”; „-Why are his present
hangmen personally and institutionally exactly the same as before?”; ”-Why today, using the
encouragement of the West, the hangmen of Ianko
Iankov avail of much more unlimited
repressive rights and opportunities than before, when they only had the
encouragement of Moscow?”; „-Why today, his
hangmen are continuing to „administer justice” not only in Bulgaria but also in the European and
world court institutions?”.
As a
matter of fact, the content of the below-mentioned seven volumes „Identity document. Political Documentation” more than clearly show that Ianko Iankov has always
determined the essence of the political
changes in Bulgaria after 1989 as secured by
the Great Powers criminal neocommunist mafia regime, and has extremely intensively addressed with
official written statement the Bulgarian state institutions and most of the
western diplomatic delegations in Sofia, as well as some of the European
institutions, whereas he has
presented official petitions for pursuit of penal responsibility of all
criminals in all levels of the previous and current Bulgarian quasi-political
and quasi-governmental system. In these seven large volumes Ianko Iankov precisely and even pedantically педантично describes the facts and the legal interpretation of
the great number of criminal encroachments on him personally, on members of his
family and on his friends, as well as on other people; and the documented behavior of both the Bulgarian
state authorities and the Western embassies unambiguously show that the
criminals were guaranteed full legal irresponsibility.
The documents in question also
show: ►that in response to his fully legally-justified demands for justice, he has
always and systematically received all kinds of new completely illegal but
precisely secured by the state institutions repressive-inquisitional strikes; and ►that in contrast to
the time of socialism, today the West has legitimated as its democratic
partners exactly these institutions and individuals that have been conducting
and are still currently conducting all modern forms of inquisition treatment
towards Yanko Yankov and the majority
of the Bulgarian citizens.
Here I should stress on a very
significant peculiarity of the behavior, statement, actions and attitude of Ianko Iankov to responsibility. To be a jurist means most of all to apply the maxim
that man as such possesses free will
and therefore he/she is personally
responsible for his actions or failures to act. (A jurist, who accepts that responsibility may be not
only personal but also collective is not a jurist but an inquisitor).
Ianko Iankov has always and on any occasion stresses on the
fact that he was not looking for responsibility from the former members of the
communist party (although the socialist
propaganda purposefully, methodically and
maliciously blamed him and did not stop to blame him of this “sin”) but only from those of them, who have committed
particular crimes according to their own laws. The opposite would mean diluting the meaning of responsibility, which the former communists (present „socialists”, „member of the center-wing” and „member of the right-wing”) very successfully managed to impose in the Bulgarian public space, using their total power over all kinds of media, their
full domination in the economic, cultural, and political life in the country,
the deliberate marginalization of the Bulgarian population and turning it into
ragamuffins.
The
records of the manipulators of the Bulgarian, European, and world public
opinion is very simple: about 2 000 000 (living and deceased) former members of the communist party plus about 1 500 000 (living and deceased) agents of the Bulgarian security services means that
each second Bulgarian is “guilty”! Thus, every
Bulgarian family appears to have averagely two “guilty” members... If everybody is guilty, then nobody is responsible–the concept “collective responsibility” is not present
in legislation.
Furthermore, the
psychological factor is also to be included – the spontaneous subconscious
opposition of the “guilty”. Hidden behind this
simple but faultlessly operative mechanism, the manipulators (the actual people guilty for the crimes) accumulate milliards on account of the “guilty” and
their families. Good-willed but unthoughtfully
allowing to be used in favor of the above mechanisms, politicians, journalists,
scientists, people of the cultural life and art multiply the thesis of
collective guilt and assist the hangman in accomplishing their misanthropic
plan. Thereafter, the mechanisms of
prescription will be effectuated, and the criminals will remain unpunished.
Ianko Iankov has been fighting all his life against this – unfortunately almost alone. Alone as the until recently slandered and now
glorified by all the “left”, the “right”, and the “center”, Bulgarian
politician – Stefan
Stambolov. Like his great predecessor, Ianko Iankov was subject of
constant attacks for slandering his personality and acts. With his precise scientific accuracy he distinguished,
analyzed, and classified the perversions of the ordered slanders against him. Regarding this, I will quote an interview taken
fifteen years ago, because what Ianko Iankov said then is still in full force today:
„I know that journalists frequently define me as a
“very colorful personality”. I do not mind being
called so, although I very well know that different people, led by different
political motives and biases, saying that mean different things. During the last ten years, my strengths and weaknesses
were totally changed, but until recently, for them I was called a “criminal”
and an “enemy of the state”. Today the
qualification run from “colorful”, “exotic”, “strange”, “peculiar character”
even to “affection”. In my opinion,
these are qualifications of those people who do not obey the terror of
widespread opinion, which (widespread opinion – ed.) in
the totalitarian and post-totalitarian societies is wrong and misanthropic. On my part, I have always had scientifically grounded
arguments for each of my disobedience. My
professional specialization is political science; my
evaluations with this respect have always been correct. As a matter of fact, the long-standing political
one-colored situation in our country created the phenomenon „political daltonism, which is expressed mainly in the
fact that people like me were (and still are!) assessed as “colorful”, as standing outside the main
colors, which in fact, this is simply a matter of professionalism. Years ago, when everything looked absolutely hopeless,
I stood against the communist system, I passed through its meat-mincer without
being interested in the system servants’ appraisals of my behavior. Later, it became obvious that it was not me the
criminal but the people who once announced me such. My actions as a leader of the opposition were taken by
many people as the actions of an “enemy of the opposition”, but now it is more
than clear that my professional evaluations were the most correct ones.”[2]
* * *
A peculiar group of facts
related to the biography of Ianko Iankov
also deserves special attention.
His sufficiently detailed
documentary books show that both he personally and his closest relatives (father, mother, brother, grandfather, grandmother,
wife, kids) and friends have not only been
in the past but are still also (those who live) subject to an impressive number of repressive
encroachments.
Both in the past and now, Ianko Iankov extremely
intensively continues to insist before the relevant institutions and pubic
circles on a pursuit of the strictest penal responsibility for each specific
individual criminal doer, whose action was
somehow related to the criminal activity of State Security.
Although the activity of State Security was official announced
criminal with a special act of the Parliament,
until now de facto and de jure none has been sentenced, and everything possible for not sentencing anyone in
the near or far future is being done (until the unsparing
laws of the natural human life duration take effect).
His documentary books expose
the attempts for elimination of his arguments in this direction (the interested criminal people and circles tried to
discredit and compromise him by statements in the media that for a short period
he was a “State Security agent”, and meanwhile doing anything possible not to allow
anyone to the records, which they declared contained evidence about their
insinuations).
Regarding this, the following
is rather curious: ►in order to force the relevant institutions to grant access both
personally to him and to the public to the documentation, which the
manipulators said represented evidence, Ianko Iankov submitted a great
number of official (notarized) Powers of Attorney of eminent Bulgarian journalists
and experts; ►consequently, most of them personally stated to Ianko Iankov that they were
threatened and that they were categorically persuaded to give up investigating
the records of State Security; ►at the end only one of the
authorized people (the expert in criminology B. T. Krastev) managed to force the Minister of Interior to grant access to the requested documentation
{but only after this expert managed to survive after the organized in the Sofia
subway attempt on his life and after he officially charged the Minister not only for this attempts but
also for trying to conceal his own (of the Minister) criminal past in service of SS, and more
specifically as an informer under the case in which Ianko Iankov was sentenced}; ►only several days
after granting access to the documentation in question, the greatest expert in graphology D. G. Kostov made notary certification of his categorical
conclusion that this documentation was fake;
►separately in other records,
evidence (several of which the so-called “Plan
for conducting operative action”) was found showing that the Scientific-Technical
Department of State Security was assigned the development of a series
of forgeries, which must have served for compromising Ianko Iankov; ►the
investigative proceeding instigated thereof in the Military Prosecution was suspended with the ridiculous
argument for “expired prescription”; ►after three intensive
interrogations as a witness, the expert-graphologist D. G. Kostov, who had never been ill
so far, suddenly died of heart attack; ►in his official
petition for investigating of the causes of this death, Ianko Iankov unambiguously
stated that the case is a case of medication terrorism, committed against D. G. Kostov as a punitive
operation for his expert opinion.
***
Ianko Iankov is married, father of three children, and
author of scientific and fiction articles,
reports
of scientific conferences and symposia, televisions interviews and other media
events, as well as the stated herein scientific
and political-documentary books.
Moreover, his books have almost the same fate as the fate of
their author:
1)
The
rich document enclosure to the first book show: ►that it was written back in 1976; ►that within the
limits of the purely scientific community, it was accepted very warmly and that
during the next year, all required at the time official scientific-expert and
institutional resolutions for its printing were undertaken; ►that due
to the ideological and political consideration of the communist authority and
its secret services, this book was actually arrested not only a long time
before the arrest of its author but also for a considerable time after his
release from prison; and ►that the book was
issued only after the political changes with personal funds of the author.
2) The rich document enclosure to
the fourth and fifth book show that both due to lack of financial funds and due
to the severe obstacles, precisely created by all possible administrative,
political, and mafia factors, these books are
issued with great difficulties, almost in conspiratorially and a long time
after their actual writing;
3)
I personally, as an editor of all books of Ianko Iankov testify: ►that to the lack of financial
funds, his books were issued on a very limited and even symbolic total print; ►that this lack of financial funds was precisely
secured by institutionally and personally the same factors and people, who earlier created ideological and political
obstacles for the publication of his books; ►that in the purely scientific
community, these books were welcomed warmly and for their content no word of
critics was written or said; and ►that the only
several people specialists in the relevant scientific field engaged in official
written, extremely positive and even strongly laudatory quotes and reviews of
these books.
4)
As a
matter of fact, the opinion of these
specialists are worth mentioning:
а)
in the
official review, the doctor of historical sciences Prof. Petar Petrov stressed on the
fact that: ►as an author Ianko Iankov showed notable erudition and knowledge of the
works of his predecessors-authors; ►he is not only extremely
correct in presenting other people’s opinion but also always taking side,
giving grounds to and defending his own
position; ►the profound scientific character of his works did not prevent the
author from narrating vividly and fascinatingly, clearly and comprehensibly; ►considering
specifically „Political and legal doctrines
of Ancient Greece” and „Political and legal doctrines of Ancient Rome”, he expressly stresses on the first complete works of
this kind in the Bulgarian literature; ►analyzing the rest of the
works regarding the political and legal doctrines in Antiquity, one can reach
the conclusion that with these books Ianko Iankov becomes the only Bulgarian researcher-jurist,
who in such thoroughness presented to the reader an extremely interesting filed
of problems, and that the scientific
contributions and the cognitive nature of these books eloquently speak about
the great erudition of their author; ►both books in psychology of
law are works with high scientific qualities, and the author is a pioneer in
Bulgaria in this field; ►analyzing the books of Ianko Iankov in terms of the
thanatological studies, one can definitely say that here the author is also a
pioneer in Bulgaria.
b) in an official review, the doctor of legal sciences Prof. Lachezar
Dachev states that: ►Ianko Iankov is the first contemporary Bulgarian
researcher-jurist, who studies the problems of psychology of law and his both
books in this field represent considerable scientific contribution because the
thesis that he enunciates is fundamentally different from the theses already
substantiated by the other authors; ►the works of Ianko Iankov regarding the
political and legal doctrines of Antiquity are a high scientific contribution
even with their very appearing because such studies in Bulgaria have never been
done; ►considerable scientific contribution is also the successful application
of the historical and culturological approach to the study of the ancient
Eastern societies; ►using this approach to the study of ancient Eastern societies Ianko Iankov has actually prepared and tested his model for analysis of the political ideas, which
consequently he developed to a new, more thorough level and applied for his
studies of the political thought of Ancient Greece and Ancient Rome; ►the study of the
political though of Ancient Greece that Ianko Iankov conducted is the first in Bulgaria thorough
study and even only this fact is of contribution nature; ►not only the scales
of the exposition is contributive but also the fundamental significance of the
problems, discussed by the author; ► the fact that while the few
Bulgarian authors, who worked on the study of political thought, permanently
addressed only the origin that discusses the political thought as ideology, Ianko Iankov is the only one,
who demonstrated categorical disagreement with this limited approach and he
studied the political thought mainly as theory, and meanwhile he beneficially
broadened the very ideological approach, is also contributive; ►Ianko Iankov is searching for an
explanation of the political ideas in the context of culture and defines them
as a social-cultural phenomena; he assumes that the
relation “thinking-action” is with a two-way
nature and based on this he defines his own specific method of study; thus, on
one hand setting the relation “lifestyle (materiality) – religion
(mythology) – mentality
of the traditional society”, Iankov achieved a culturological explanation of the
political ideas; but on the other hand he connected and explained the meaning
of the political ideas with the relation “thinking
–
political thinking – political behavior”, whereas the two lines of analysis are related and skillfully combined; even at times, the reader loses orientation about them
but the effect is very good: the reader is
“absorbed” in the reproduced historical
reality and clearly understands the logics of the political thinking of the
world of that time, reflected in
political ideas, and this is the next indisputable contribution of the study.
c) In an official review, the doctor of legal sciences Prof. Mihaylina
Mihaylova stresses on the fact that: ►in his books, specific for
their impressive volume and content of high scientific value, Ianko Iankov gives new trends in the legal science and shows
impressive philosophical and scientific erudition; ►although the
discipline to which the book “Political and legal doctrines in Ancient
Greece” is referred to long ago has its scientific status and prestige (whereas all looks already said, collected, and
systematized), Ianko Iankov has found a new a
new standpoint, he has applied his own
approach to the topic and achieved new scientific content; ►Ianko Iankov is modern in all
his works; especially indicative example
in terms of this are his studies in Psychology of Law, in which he demonstrated overcoming and outgrowing of
all authors, who wrote on this topic before him; ►the capacity of Ianko Iankov as a theorist with modern and perspective though is lavishly displayed
in his works in Thantology; ►his study of the problems of
euthanasia and the right of death is the first one in the Bulgarian legal
science in this field, and everything
written by the author on this matter is in full his contribution to the
Bulgarian legal science; ►Ianko Iankov is copious in his scientific works; courageous and original as a thinker; innovator in science and in teaching; pioneer in several trends of the legal science; remarkable erudite both in philosophy and in each
separate private science concerning the law;
precise
in the content and significant regarding his decisions; especially in his studies of the death penalty and
euthanasia he demonstrated skills in performing a proficient legal
interpretation; his high erudition has
predestined also his affinity to the methodology, marking a priority in all his
works.
d) In the officially recorded statement before a special
forum of highly qualified jurists, the doctor of legal sciences Prof. Vladimir
Petrov was categorical that: ►Ianko Iankov has always combined in himself the qualities of
a citizen and a professor; thus he was before
the political “change” on November 10, 1989, when he has the
courage to express opinion and defend standpoints, and “when personally to me he has
demonstrated what is means to be courageous and brave by defending me before
instances, before which no one
dared express doubt or suspicion”; ►”from his very first years of assistance professor Ianko
Iankov has
shown that he was a person who had no other life but the life dedicated to
science; this trend in his behavior he
continued to demonstrate until today – he
was among the politicians, for whom everything showed that they will be on top
of the Bulgarian politics because he was not only a leader of a party but also one of the few
people, who were actually repressed but yet gave up on politics to dedicate
himself to his real love - science.”
***
In my opinion, Nikolay Mihaylov, nevertheless, one both small and at the same time huge and even fateful specifying specially
to the opinion of Prof. Dr. Vladimir Petrov is required.
In two of his epistolary
statement written on September
19, 1980 and January 08, 1981 (published in the appendix to his first book)[3] Ianko Iankov stressed on the
fact that: ►it was a public secret that “in Bulgaria, there are quite a lot of
people, who pretend to be patriarchs in science, while actually they cannot and do not deserve to be
even miserable sextons”; ►„in
order to strengthen their situation, these pseudo-scientific workers form their
likes”, “and judging as Procrustes, zealously create
and maintain atmosphere, in which the audacious innovators are extremely
unwanted and are subject to accusations of thousands “deadly sins””; ►”because the good-for-nothing are willing to
do anything, they create such an
atmosphere, which frequently, with no exaggeration, can be called “hell””; ►”we
can’t hide the fact that the dark forces, which strive to turn the
sincere love to science into prostitution with science, are too strong”; ►then, from the time of his release from prison in 1989 until now, Ianko Iankov has always said that “Bulgarian is run by exactly the
same “dark forces””, and that “one of their main strategies is to turn the
natural love of man to politics into prostitution with politics”.
The matter is in the fact: ►that as
well as before, now, both in science and in politics in Bulgaria only the unnatural form of relations dominates in total, and that only the
contextual (but not the
organizational-institutional!) sphere of science
is the one that responded with reciprocity to the great love of Ianko Iankov; and ►that both in the institutional sphere of
science and in the institutional sphere of politics (but not in the contextual
one!) Ianko Iankov was subject to constant and pronounced hostile
attitude, created and maintained by the
same “dark forces”, against which he
has never given up fighting.
* * *
I constantly ask myself: „-Where did Ianko Iankov find strength for the extremely difficult
struggle that he leads? How does he do it
with such feeling of confidence and inexorability? Is there any secret force, any spring that keep him charged for his
daily non-routine battles with routine, unscrupulous, economic and political
powerful opponents?” I searched for the
answer in his descent.
His parents are typical
country workers, typical Bulgarian mother and
father – those who would “scrape the dirt under their nails” to have their
children get on their feet, become worthy people. The corns on their hand have long ago turned into hard sole-leather, cut by black enamel, which cannot be washed with any
soap or detergent. Their faces are
tanned from the constant touch with the sun on the field. If they are stooped, it is due to the constant bows
before the earth-breeder (not anybody else!). That’s the way I saw and remembered Iank’s parents, his mother Evtima and his
father Nikola, ordinary people, utterly pragmatic, kind-hearted and good-natured until the moment you
step on then – honorable people, worthy, hardworking, with strong sense
of responsibility. These ordinary
Bulgarians have formed a daily atmosphere, in which the boy from the small
refugee village of Klisuritsa grew up and formed as a personality. To the journalists’ question: “Where do you find
strengths from to survive and go ahead?”, Ianko Iankov replied:
“I am certain that had I not
been a countryman, I wouldn’t have endured. I am a countryman
and gather strength from the land. I love ploughing,
hoeing, mowing. The smell of newly ploughed soil and the newly cut hay
hypnotizes me. Indisputably the
communists knew that the earth can “give strength” and set the pattern for
opposition in people and for many years they were destructing the relation of
man with the earth, but they did not manage to do that with me.”
Surprised
and
disgraced are the people who tried to
throw mud on and eliminate Yanko Yankov from
politics, as well as to
ignore his in science. He proved that he
is a big personality not only as a politician, but also as a scientist, man,
and citizen. Because he has this
divine spark that is stronger that the demonic attempts of all dark forces. Because God has generously awarded his with the talent
to love truth, justice, and knowledge.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Scientific production
[Bibliography (List) of the published books]
&
for
Ianko N. Iankov-Velyovski
01.Nikolay Mihaylov, Ianko Iankov. BioBibliography (in English, French, German, and Bulgarian), Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2006, 176 pp., ISBN-10:
954-85-50-55-5, ISBN-13:
978-954-8550-55-0, Dimensions: 60 х 84 х 16;
02.Nikolay Mihaylov, Ianko Iankov-Velyovsky. Biographical
fragments (in Bulgarian), Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2012, 335 pp., ISBN:
978-954-8550-94-9, Dimensions: 70 х 100 х 16.
&
of
Ianko N. Iankov-Velyovski
01.Iankov
Ianko (Yankov Yanko), Prognostics. Theoretical and Methodological Problems, Sofia, Ianus
Publishing Company, 1993, 288 pр. Dimensions: 60 x 84/ 16, ISBN 954-799-178-7;
02.Iankov Ianko (Yankov Yanko), Document
for Identity. Political Documentary, Vol.
1., Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 1994, 640 pp. Gross Dimensions: 70 x 100/ 16, ISBN 954-8550-02-4;
03.Iankov Ianko (Yankov Yanko), Document
for Identity. Political Documentary, Vol.
2, Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 1995, 576 pp. Gross Dimensions: 70 x 100/
16, ISBN 954-8550-04-0;
04.Iankov Ianko (Yankov Yanko),
Introduction to the Psychology of Law, Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 1998, 322 pр. Dimensions: 60 x 84/
16, ISBN 954-8550-06-7;
05.Iankov
Ianko, Psychology of Law, Vol. 1, Sofia, Ianus
Publishing Company, 2002, 518 pр. Dimensions: 60 x 84/ 16, ISBN 954-8550-18-0 (Vol. 1);
06.
Iankov Ianko, Document for Identity. Political Documentary, Vol. 3, Bulgarian State
Abdicates in Favour of the Red Mafia, Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2002, 576 рp. Gross Dimensions: 70 x 100/
16, ISBN 954-8550-07-5 (Vol. 3);
07.Iankov Ianko, Document for
Identity. Political Documentary, Vol. 4, Who Is
the West Defending – Human Rights or Red Mafia, Sofia, Ianus
Publishing Company, 2003, 568 pр. Gross Dimensions: 70 x 100/
16, ISBN 954-8550-09-1 (Vol. 4);
08.Iankov Ianko, Document for
Identity. Political Documentary, Vol. 5, Who Is
the West Defending – Human Rights or Red Mafia, Sofia, Ianus
Publishing Company, 2003, 546 pр. Gross Dimensions: 70 x 100/ 16, ISBN
954-8550-20-2 (Vol. 5);
09.Iankov
Ianko, Political and Legal Doctrines of Mesopotamia, Sofia, Ianus
Publishing Company, 2004, 148 pр. Dimensions: 60 x 84/ 16, ISBN 954-8550-24-5;
10.Iankov Ianko, Political and Legal
Doctrines of Ancient Egypt, Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2004, 94 pр. Dimensions: 60 x 84/
16, ISBN 954-8550-25-3;
11.Iankov Ianko, Political and Legal
Doctrines of Ancient Iran, Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2004, 98 pр. Dimensions: 60 x 84/
16, ISBN 954-8550-26-1;
12.Iankov Ianko, Political and Legal
Doctrines of Judea, Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2004, 126 pр. Normal Dimensions: 60 x 84/
16, ISBN 954-8550-27-х;
13.Iankov
Ianko, Political and Legal Doctrines of Ancient China, Sofia, Ianus
Publishing Company, 2004, 132 pр. Dimensions: 60 x 84/ 16, ISBN 954-8550-28-8;
14.Iankov Ianko, Political and Legal
Doctrines of Ancient India, Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2004, 94 pр. Dimensions: 60x 84/ 16, ISBN 954-8550-29-6;
15.Iankov Ianko, Alphabetical
Truths. Sparks of Wit, Nominated by Dungeon, Sofia, Ianus
Publishing Company, 2004, 352 pр. Dimensions: 60 x 84/ 16, ISBN 954-8550-11-3;
16.Iankov Ianko, The Euthanasia.
Thanatological Aspects, Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2004, 76 pр. Dimensions: 60 x 84/
16, ISBN 954-8550-32-6;
17.Iankov Ianko, The Death Penalty.
Thanatological Aspects, Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2004, 134
pр. Normal Dimensions: 60 x 84/
16, ISBN 954-8550-15-6;
18.Iankov Ianko, Introduction to
Thanatology. Phenomenology of Life and Death, Sofia, Ianus
Publishing Company, 2004, 202 pр. Dimensions: 60 x 84/ 16, ISBN 954-8550-21-0;
19.Iankov Ianko, The Russian
Terrorism, Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2004, 130 pр. Dimensions: 60 x 84/ 16, ISBN 954-8550-33-4;
20.Iankov Ianko, Political and Legal
Doctrines of Ancient Greece, Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2004, 532 pр. Dimensions: 60 x 84/
16, ISBN 954-8550-30-х;
21.Iankov
Ianko, Political and Legal Doctrines of Ancient Rome, Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2004, 456 pр. Dimensions: 60 x 84/
16, ISBN 954-8550-31-8;
22.Iankov Ianko, The Bulgarian
Terrorism, Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2004, 176 pр. Dimensions: 60 x 84/ 16, ISBN 954-8550-34-2;
23.Iankov Ianko, Chronology of Most
Notorious Terrorist Acts, Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2004, 150
pр. Dimensions: 60 x 84/ 16, ISBN 954-8550-35-0;
24.Iankov Ianko, Document for
Identity. Political Documentary, Vol. 6, Who Is
the West Defending – Human Rights or Red Mafia, Sofia, Ianus
Publishing Company, 2005, 526 pр. Gross Dimensions: 70 x 100/
16, ISBN 954-8550-22-9 (Vol. 6);
25.Iankov Ianko, Prognostics.
Theoretical and Methodological Problems. (Second
Edition), Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2006, 444 pр. Dimensions: 60 x 84/
16, ISBN 954-8550-37-7;
26.Iankov
Ianko, The Кilling. Thanatological Aspects, Sofia, Ianus
Publishing Company, 2006, 142 pр. Dimensions: 60 х 84/ 16, ISBN-10: 954-8550-54-7; ISBN-13:
978-954-8550-54-3;
27.Iankov
Ianko, The Suicide. Thanatological Aspects, Sofia, Ianus
Publishing Company, 2006, 126 pр. Dimensions: 60 х 84/ 16, ISBN-10: 954-8550-53-9; ISBN-13:
978-954-8550-53-6;
28.Iankov
Ianko, Political and Legal Doctrines of the Medieval Orient, Sofia, Ianus
Publishing Company, 2006, 150 pр. Dimensions: 60 х 84/ 16, ISBN-10:
954-8550-50-4; ISBN-13:
978-954-8550-50-5;
29.Iankov
Ianko, Political and Legal Doctrines of Bizantium, Sofia, Ianus
Publishing Company, 2006, 166 pр. Dimensions: 60 х 84/ 16, ISBN-10:
954-8550-49-0; ISBN-13:
978-954-8550-49-9;
30.Iankov
Ianko, The Political Killings. Book One. Who
Killed Volodya Nakov. (Documentary), Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company,
2006, 150 pp. Dimensions: 60 х 84/
16, ISBN 954-8550-10-5;
31.Iankov
Ianko, The Bulgarian Terrorism (Second Edition), Sofia, Ianus
Publishing Company, 2006, 226 pp. Dimensions: 60 x 84/
16, ISBN-10: 954-8550-51-2;
ISBN-13:978-954-8550-51-2;
32.Iankov
Ianko, The Secret Services and the Scientific Fellows in Bulgarian Academy
of Sciences and Sofia University. (Political Documentary. Book One), Sofia, Ianus
Publishing Company, 2006, 144 pp. Dimensions: 60 х 84/ 16, ISBN-10:
954-8550-48-2; ISBN-13:
978-954-8550-48-2;
33.Iankov Ianko, Political and Legal Doctrines. Basic
Aspects of Political and Legal Genesis, Vol.
1, The Ancient East, Sofia, Ianus
Publishing Company, 2006, 486 pp. Gross Dimensions: 70 х 100/
16, ISBN 954-8550-42-3 (Vol. 1);
34.Iankov Ianko, Political and Legal Doctrines. Basic Aspects
of Political and Legal Genesis, Vol.
2, Ancient Europe. Greece, Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2006, 452 pp. Gross Dimensions: 70 х 100/
16, ISBN 954-8550-42-3 (Vol. 2);
35.Iankov Ianko, Political and Legal Doctrines. Basic Aspects
of Political and Legal Genesis, Vol.
3, Ancient Europe. Rome,
Sofia, Ianus Publishing
Company, 2006, 412 pp. Gross Dimensions: 70 х 100/
16, ISBN 954-8550-42-3 (Vol. 3);
36.Iankov Ianko, The
Bulgarian Terrorism. (Thrid Edition), Sofia, Mirror
Publishing Company, 2006, 222 pp. Dimensions: 60 x 84/ 16;
37.Iankov Ianko, The
Political Killings. Who Prevented Me from Killing the Vice
President Yaroslav Radev and the Ex-Prime Minister Andrey Lukanov (Documentary),
Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2007, 156 pp. Dimensions: 60 х 84/ 16, ISBN-10: 954-8550-12-1 (Vol. 2); ISBN-13:
978-954-8550-12-3 (Vol. 2);
38.Iankov Ianko, Thanatology. A
Science for Humanization of Life through Demystification of Death, Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company,
2007, 752 pp. Gross Dimensions: 70 х 100/
16, ISBN-10: 954-8550-36-9; ISBN-13: 978-954-8550-36-9;
39.Iankov Ianko, The Pandora’s Box.
A Kaleidoscopic Vision on Terrorism, Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company,
2007, 630 pp. Gross Dimensions: 70 х 100/
16, ISBN-10: 954-8550-16-4; ISBN-13: 978-954-8550-16-1;
40.Iankov Ianko, Political
and Legal Doctrines. Basic Aspects of Political and Legal genesis, Vol. 4, Middle Ages, Book 1. Orient. Byzantium,
Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2007, 230 pp. Gross Dimensions: 70 х 100/
16, ISBN-13:
978-954-8550-61-1;
41.Iankov Ianko, Political and Legal Doctrines. Basic
Aspects of Political and Legal Genesis, Vol.
5, Book 2, Russia, Sofia, Ianus
Publishing Company, 2007, 744 pp. Gross Dimensions: 70 х 100/
16, ISBN 978-954-8550-62-8;
42.Iankov Ianko, Political
and Legal Doctrines. Basic Aspects of Political and Legal Genesis, Vol. 6, Middle Ages, Book
3, Western
Europe, Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2007, 478 pp. Gross Dimensions: 70 х 100/
16, ISBN 978-954-8550-63-5;
43.Iankov Ianko, Political and Legal Doctrines. Basic
Aspects of Political and Legal Genesis, Vol.
7, The New Time, Book 1, Sofia, Ianus
Publishing Company, 2007, 447 pp. Gross Dimensions: 70 х 100/
16, ISBN 978-954-8550-65-9;
44.Iankov Ianko, Science notes and fragments. (Parameters of
psychotronic power and capacity to protect human nature), Sofia, Ianus
Publishing Company, 2007, 470 pp. Gross Dimensions: 70 х 100/
16, ISBN 978-954-8550-69-7;
45.Iankov Ianko,Document
for Identity. Political
Documentary, Vol. 7,
Conclusive Messages to the Mafia, Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2007, 546
pp. Gross Dimensions: 70 х 100/
16, ISBN-10: 954-8550-57-1, ISBN-13: 978-954-8550-57-4;
46.Iankov Ianko, Document
for Identity. Political
Documentary, Vol. 8,
Conclusive Messages to the Mafia. Letters to European and World Institutions
and Leaders, Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2007, 640 pp. Gross Dimensions: 70 х 100/
16) ISBN: 978-954-8550-58-1;
47.Iankov Ianko, Document
for Identity. Political
Documentary, Vol. 9, Letters
to European and World Institutions and Leaders. Conclusive Messages to the
Mafia, Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2007, 620 pp. Gross Dimensions: 70 х 100/
16) ISBN: 978-954-8550-60-4;
48.Iankov Ianko, The
Legitimate Bases of Political Power in Bulgaria, Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company,
2007, 491 pp. Gross Dimensions: 70 х 100/ 16) ISBN-10: 954-8550-14-8, ISBN-13: 978-954-8550-14-7;
49.Iankov Ianko, Political
and Legal Doctrines. Basic Aspects of Political and Legal Genesis, Vol. 8, The New Time, Book 2, Sofia, Ianus
Publishing Company, 2008, 445 pp. Gross Dimensions: 70 х 100/
16, ISBN 978-954-8550-66-6;
50.Iankov Ianko,
Articles. Studies. Notes, Vol. 1,
Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2010, 421 pp. Gross Dimensions: 70 х 100/
16, ISBN: 978-954-8550-68-0;
51.Iankov Ianko, The Bulgarian Post-communist Genocide
(Documentary), Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2010, 430 pp. Gross Dimensions: 70 х 100/ 16, ISBN
978-954-8550-64-2;
52.Iankov Ianko,
Political and Legal Doctrines. Basic Aspects of Political and Legal Genesis, Vol. 9, The New Time. Book 3,
Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2010, 400 pp. Gross Dimensions: 70 х 100/ 16, ISBN 978-954-8550-67-3;
53.Iankov Ianko, Who Is the West Defending – Human Rights or Red
Mafia (Epistolary political documentary), Sofia, Ianus
Publishing Company, 2010, 155 pp. Gross Dimensions: 70 х 100/
16, ISBN 978-954-8550-83-3;
54.Iankov Ianko, Articles.
Studies. Notes, Vol. 2,
Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2011, 229 pp. Gross Dimensions: 70 х 100/
16, ISBN: 978-954-8550-84-0;
55.Iankov Ianko,
Articles. Studies. Notes, Vol. 3,
Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2011, 303 pp. Gross Dimensions: 70 х 100/
16, ISBN: 978-954-8550-86-4;
56.Iankov Ianko, Document
for Identity. Political
Documentary, Vol. 10, Sofia, Ianus
Publishing Company, 2011, 419 pp. Gross Dimensions: 70 х 100/
16, ISBN: 978-954-8550-88-8;
57.Iankov Ianko, Document
for Identity. Political
Documentary, Vol. 11, Sofia, Ianus
Publishing Company, 2011, 202 pp. Gross Dimensions: 70 х 100/
16, ISBN: 978-954-8550-89-5;
58.Iankov Ianko,
Articles. Studies. Notes, Vol. 4,
Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2011, 207 pp. Gross Dimensions: 70 х 100/
16, ISBN: 978-954-8550-91-8;
59.Iankov Ianko,
Articles. Studies. Notes, Vol. 5,
Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2012, 399 pp. Gross Dimensions: 70 х 100/
16, ISBN: 978-954-8550-92-5;
60.Iankov Ianko,
Articles. Studies. Notes, Vol. 6,
Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2012, 330 pp. Gross Dimensions: 70 х 100/
16, ISBN: 978-954-8550-95-6;
61.Iankov Ianko, Who Is the West
Defending – Human Rights or Red Mafia. (Epistolary political-juridical documentary), Second
Edition, Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2012, 447 pp. Gross Dimensions: 70 х 100/ 16,
ISBN 978-954-8550-97-0;
62.Iankov Ianko, The
Sofian Water and the Genocide on Sofia’s Citizens, Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2012, 217 pp. Gross Dimensions: 70 х 100 х 16, ISBN: 978-954-8550-82-6;
63.Iankov Ianko,
Articles. Studies. Notes, Vol. 7,
Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2012, 285 pp. Gross Dimensions: 70 х 100/
16, ISBN: 978-619-7008-02-9;
64.Iankov Ianko, Letters
to „the Gardeners“ of the West embassies in Sofia (Epistolary
political-juridical documentary), Sofia,
Ianus
Publishing Company, 2012, 346 pp.
Gross Dimensions: 70
х 100 х 16, ISBN:
978-954-8550-03-6;
&
In process of exploration,
development and preparing
for printing:
65; 66; 67; 68;
69.Iankov Ianko, The Bulgarian Democratic Genocide. Letters to Hague.
(Epistolary political-juridical documentary), Vol. 1, Vol. 2, Vol. 3, Vol. 4,
Vol.5, Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company,
2014-2015, 2600 pp. Gross Dimensions: 70
х 100 х 16, ISBN:
978-619-7008-01-2;
70.Iankov Ianko, Elites. Secret Services. Secret Power, Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2014, 300 pp. Gross Dimensions: 70 х 100 х 16, ISBN: 978-954-8550-73-4;
71.Iankov Ianko,
Political Mythology, Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2015, 350 pp. Gross Dimensions: 70 х 100/ 16, ISBN: 978-954-8550-39-0;
72.Iankov Ianko,
Rhetoric, Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2015, 400 pp. Gross Dimensions: 70 х 100/ 16, ISBN:
978-954-8550-70-3;
73.Iankov Ianko, The Secret Services
and the Legal Scientific Nomenclatura. Bio-Psycho-Portraits, Sofia, Ianus
Publishing Company, 2015, 420
pp. Gross Dimensions: 70 х 100/ 16,
ISBN 978-954-8550-98-7;
74.Iankov Ianko,
Philosophy of Law. (Philosophical
Reflections and Receptions in the Law), Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2016, 650 pp. Gross Dimensions: 70 х 100/ 16, ISBN: 978-954-8550-59-8;
75.Iankov Ianko, The Political
Management, Sofia, Ianus
Publishing Company, 2015, 350 pp. Gross Dimensions: 70 х 100/
16, ISBN:
978-954-8550-85-7;
76.Iankov Ianko, Political
Medicallism. Illness in
the Field of Political Power, Sofia,
Ianus
Publishing Company, 2014, 350 pp. Gross Dimensions: 70 х
100/ 16, ISBN:
978-954-8550-41-3;
77.Iankov Ianko, Psychology of Politics, Sofia,
Ianus
Publishing Company, 2016, 500
pp. Gross Dimensions: 70 х 100/ 16, ISBN: 978-954-8550-38-3;
78.Iankov Ianko, The Road to Europe.
Bulgaria in the Field of Value Peripherals and Geopolitical Strategies, Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2015, 500 pp. Gross Dimensions: 70 х 100/
16, ISBN:
978-954-8550-46-8;
79.Iankov Ianko, The Red Mafia.
Politological Analysis of Post-communist Criminality, Sofia, Ianus
Publishing Company, 2014, 230 pp. Gross
Dimensions: 70 х 100 х 16, ISBN: 978-954-8550-17-8;
80.Iankov Ianko, The Green Monster of
State Security. Ghost or Reality is the Bulgarian Medical Terrorism, Sofia, Ianus
Publishing Company, 2015, 200
pp. Gross Dimensions: 70
х 100 х 16, ISBN:
978-954-8550-56-7;
81.Iankov Ianko, Contemporary Legal
Systems, Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2016, 450
pp. Gross Dimensions: 70
х 100 х 16, ISBN:
978-954-8550-96-3;
82.Iankov Ianko, Science
Notes and Fragments. (Parameters of psychotronic power and capacity to protect
human nature), Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2015, 470 pp. Gross Dimensions: 70 х 100/ 16, ISBN
978-954-8550-69-7.
[1] Nameranski, N.,
The
names of the villages in Berkovitsa, Mihaylovgrad and Lom Region, Sofia, 1991, p. 37, 131; Ianko I. Identity document. Political documentation. - Sofia, Vol. 4, 2003, p. 109-110.
2Ianko Nikolov VELYOVSKI is the actual name of the person, who obtained citizenship as Ianko Nikolov IANKOV. Trying to detach children from parents, from families
and kin and to attach them to the socialist “idea”, to force them forget their
actual roots, in the 60’s, the Bulgarian Communist Party legally imposed
elimination of the family name and replaced it with the name of the grandparent
on the father’s side.
Няма коментари:
Публикуване на коментар